Volume 34 - Issue 2 Fordham International Law Journal

Head-of-State and Foreign Official Immunity in the United States After Samantar: A Suggested Approach

A concept of immunity for foreign heads of state has existed since ancient times. Such immunity constitutes customary international law (“CIL”) and, when applicable, frees such individuals from the criminal jurisdiction of foreign nations while carrying out their duties. In the United States, executive branch guidance is considered determinative on the issue of foreign head-of-state [...]

Read More

Formalization of Plea Bargaining in Germany: Will the New Legislation be Able to Square the Circle?

In German criminal trials, the common law instrument of the guilty plea is unknown. Consequently, one cannot speak of plea bargaining in the strict sense. Nevertheless, informal negotiations, which center on the exchange of a confession for a sentence concession, play an increasing role in the German criminal process. It is claimed that in today’s [...]

Read More

Pirates and Impunity: Is the Threat of Asylum Claims a Reason to Allow Pirates to Escape Justice?

Pirates are literally getting away with murder. Modern pirates are attacking vessels, hijacking ships at gunpoint, taking hostages, and injuring and killing crew members. They are doing so with increasing frequency. According to the International Maritime Bureau (“IMB”) Piracy Reporting Center’s 2009 Annual Report, there were 406 pirate attacks in 2009—a number that has not [...]

Read More

The Complementary Faces of Legitimacy in International Law: The Legitimacy of Origin and the Legitimacy of Exercise

Global governance rests on the exercise of public authority by a myriad of actors. In the international order, the more powers and influence these actors acquire, the more their legitimacy proves to be controversial. It is submitted here that the legitimacy of international, regional, and domestic actors that partake in global governance—those considered here as [...]

Read More

Characterizing US Operations in Pakistan: Is the United States Engaged in an Armed Conflict?

This Article examines whether the United States is engaged in an armed conflict—as defined by International Humanitarian Law (“IHL”)—with the Tehrik-i-Taliban (“TTP”) in Pakistan, and if so, explores the nature of that engagement. Part I provides background information on the TTP and other militant groups; the development and current state of hostilities between Pakistan and the [...]

Read More