DEFINING, PUNISHING, AND MEMBERSHIP IN THE COMMUNITY OF NATIONS: MATERIAL SUPPORT AND CONSPIRACY CHARGES IN MILITARY COMMISSIONS
This Article breaks new ground both normatively and descriptively. It relies on the Enlightenment’s psychology of law as an interpretive lens for both the enactment of the Define and Punish Clause and subsequent US practice. Other scholars have noted the Framers’ distrust of short-term impulse and their quest for a structure that would encourage longer-term [...]
PERCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON JUDGES AND APPEARANCES
Judges, whether presiding over bench and jury trials as they do in the United States, or serving as specially-trained careerists as they do in civil law countries, are at the heart of the fact-finding and legal inquiries required of judicial officers. As the individuals charged with implementing an entire nation’s justice system, judges carry a [...]
EMERGING FROM THE HAZE OF AMERICA’S WAR ON DRUGS AND EXAMINING CANADA’S NEW HALF-BAKED LAWS
On June 17, 2006, seven former US drug czars met in Washington D.C. to mark the thirty-first anniversary of the war on drugs and to proclaim a unanimous conclusion: the United States had won the war against illegal drugs. By most measures, however, the current state of the US criminal justice system would suggest a different [...]
KICKING THE PENALTY: WHY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE SHOULD ALLOW SALARY CAPS IN UEFA
FROM ABORTION TO ISLAM: THE CHANGING FUNCTION OF LAW IN EUROPE’S CULTURAL DEBATES
The Article rethinks the law’s role in present-day European debates over Islam in light of its calming effects on the once fiercely-fought abortion reforms across Western Europe. Using examples from Germany, Italy, France, Belgium, Britain, the Netherlands and Switzerland the article demonstrates that the role of the legal process in each of these culture-based debates [...]
