48 Years of Impactful Scholarship
Banner_Library2.jpg

ILJ Online

ILJ Online is the online component of Fordham International Law Journal.

Posts in Blog
Turkey’s Withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention: Lack of Rights for Victims of Gender Based Violence

Volume XLV staff editor Esat Acar argues that Turkey’s withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention has severe consequences for victims of gender based violence, directly through the removal of legal protections, but also indirectly through the signaling effect withdrawal has and the removal of the monitoring mechanism of the convention, GREVIO.

Read More
BlogFordham ILJEsat Acar
The Long-Lasting Legacy of US Federal Judges on Immigration

Volume XLV staff editor Micaela Gold argues that Trump-appointed judges have complicated the roll-back of Trump-era immigration policy, such as the Remain in Mexico policy. The Remain in Mexico policy has placed asylum seekers in danger by forcing many to await their asylum hearings in Mexico. The Biden administration has been forced to enforce the policy despite an attempted rescission.

Read More
BlogFordham ILJMicaela Gold
After Global Minimum Corporate Tax — Next Steps for Modern Economies and Corporations

Volume XLV staff editor Rosa Kim discusses how world leaders gathered and agreed to set a global minimum corporate tax rate of 15 percent, a first step towards global tax reform to disincentivize multinational corporations’ tax avoidance practices. The next step would be to tackle IP-derived income, which also impact offshoring of patents and software IP to minimize corporate taxes.

Read More
BlogFordham ILJRosa Kim
Searching for Truth and Justice between Sectarian Walls: How Sectarianism has Revealed itself in the Case of the Beirut Blast

Volume XLV staff editor Abrahim Assaily investigates the ways in which the judicial investigation into the "Beirut Blast" has revealed the way that sectarianism has infected the Lebanese judicial system. And, why attempts to overcome this sectarianism have been met with hostility and violence from the political system.

Read More
Internet Access as A Global Human Right: A Response to A Pandemic That Could Eradicate the Most Fundamental Human Rights

Volume XLV staff editors Danielle Cepelewicz and Maura McKeon call for global digital reform to make access to the internet a mandatory right as a matter of customary international law. The coronavirus pandemic has revealed the internet’s necessity as a source of communication and as a safeguard of the most fundamental rights, including but not limited to freedom of expression, freedom of religious worship, right to work, and right to education. Without the internet, many have had to face the possibility that the pandemic might eradicate their most fundamental rights. The denial of rights has had a disproportionate impact on impoverished communities.

Read More